Posts Tagged ‘Mike Spence’

(Getty)

HRH Prince Phillip during a ‘cooks tour’ of Coventry Climax Ltd, Widdrington Road, Coventry on 21 June 1966…

I tripped over these photographs searching for shots of the FWMV four-valve heads- that 1.5 litre V8 was the engine Jim Clark used to win his 1963 and 1965 F1 titles in the rear of Lotus 25 and 33 chassis, the second of his cups was won using the four-valver.

Unsuccessful as i was in my search for an image of one of the final iterations of this lauded engine, i did find this beauty of a ‘normal’ two valver with HRH alongside- who are the technicians exchanging cam timing details with the chief i wonder?

(Getty)

The one below of the Prince wandering towards the 1.5 litre, still-born, FWMW Flat-16 made me chuckle as it reminded me of a DC Nye anecdote which goes along the lines of the Climax hierachy showing off the ultimate expression of their design and precision engineering capabilities- which was singing its supreme song on the test bed, but conversation was impossible, so Climax Managing Director Leonard Lee instructed revs to be cut back- a fatal mistake as 5000rpm or more was needed, below that critical number savage torsional vibration caused the quill shaft to break with plentiful mechanical mayhem following shortly thereafter- which it did. Whilst not an engineer the royal understood that something was amiss, making soothing sounds of sympathy, he wandered further along the corridors.

Check out the engines below- FWMV show engine, FWMW 16 in the right foreground, an outboard to the left of Lee, but what is the Amal fed four in front of the Prince?

Coventry Climax MD, Leonard Lee, HRH, Wally Hassan with hands in suit pockets behind and others- any clue folks? (Getty)

 

Prince Phillip sussing a CC dyno before sixteen cylinder carnage sets in (Getty)

None of the four FWMW engines laid down ever found their way into the cars designed for them- oil drainage, pumping and windage losses and time pressures ensured that- the 1.5 litre formula ended and Climax decided not to continue in racing so the Lotus 39, Brabham BT19 and Cooper T80 never raced with the sixteen cylinder engine for which they were designed but with a 2.5 Climax FPF four, 3 litre Repco Brabham 620 V8 and 3 litre Maserati V12 instead.

Theoretical advantages of higher revs, greater piston area and better breathing of the sixteen were never realised, but that FWMV four valve V8 delivered the goods even if its advantage over its more conventional sibling was marginal, mind you, in 1.5 litres 5 bhp makes a difference particularly if Clark J was behind the wheel of the car to which said engine was fitted.

(MotorSport)

What a jewel of a thing and what might have been had the 1.5 litre formula lasted another year? FWMW 16 on the test bed in 1965.

The antecedent engine of the Flat-Sixteen conceived by Climax Technical Director Wally Hassan and Chief Designer Peter Windsor-Smith was the 38hp ‘Featherweight’ 1020cc, SOHC four- from little things do big things grow. The two men set about design and construction of a 1.5 litre, twin-cam, two-valve, fuel injected sixteen cylinder engine with central power take off with projected power of circa 240-250bhp @ 12,000rpm after extrapolating the power of the best of the FWMV’s to the greater piston area of their proposed new engine.

Whilst twelve and sixteen cylinder engines were considered, the sixteen modelled best using the bore/stroke ratio of the successful Mk3 FWMV of 0.76:1- this provided for a bore and stroke of 54.1mm by 40.64mm giving a piston area of 23cm. Using the previously achieved 4.5bhp per square inch of piston area gave the 250bhp projection.

Lets not forget competitive pressures were the cause of this exciting engine’s birth- both Ferrari and Honda were racing twelves which showed promise, but 1964 ended up a battle of V8’s- Ferrari, BRM and Coventry Climax of course, with John Surtees’ Ferrari 158 taking the titles by the narrowest of margins.

The design influence of the Ferrari Flat-12 engine showed in that Climax contemplated the motor being used as a stressed member so chassis mounting points for the combined crankcase and cylinder block were provided on the crankcase and heads, of which there were four- four sets of four cylinders.

The crankshaft had central take off to minimise the torsional vibrations of such a long piece of exotic metal- the crank was laid out as two, four-throw single plane-units running in five main bearings but turned through 90 degrees to each other with their inner ends shrunk onto a central spur-gear. The spur gear passed power to an output shaft running below the crank at 80% of engine speed to suit the gearing of the ZF and Hewland transmissions used contemporarily.

1954 ad for the Coventry Climax Featherweight powered firepump unit. In 1951 the prototype 1020cc OHC, two valve, single carb, inline four produced 36bhp @ 3500rpm and delivered twice as much water as an existing unit which weighed double the weight of the Climax FW

 

Vic Berris cutaway showing the elegant simplicity…of the Climax FWMW Sixteen- oh what mighta been! Specifications as per text

The heads, as described above, used two valves and a single plug- the included angle between the valves was 48 degrees with inlet tracts designed for the port type Lucas fuel injection with which the designers were well familiar- Lucas also provided the transistorised ignition system.

Trains of spur gears running off the central power takeoff drove oil pressure and scavenge pumps down below and and the twin overhead camshafts and auxiliaries above the takeoff. Auxiliaries were located outta the way atop the crankcase comprised twin fuel injection pumps, the distributors and alternator- whilst the motor sounds huge it was small- only one inch longer than the FWMV at 30.9 inches and 22.6 inches wide.

Design commenced in 1963 with the first run on the dyno in late 1964- the major problem, as Prince Phillip will attest, was severe torsional vibration at low revs. A stronger replacement took too long and also failed- the best seen on test was 209bhp, none of the problems were insurmountable but the 1965 season was underway with developments of the good ole FWMV good enough to do the job.

Richie Ginther’s Honda RA272 V12 win at Mexico City in the very last Grand Prix of the marvellous 1.5 litre Formula in late October 1965 was perhaps a portent of what may have been an amazing battle between the Ferrari and Honda twelves and Climax sixteen in 1966 had the Formula run one more year, ignoring the small matter of Climax’ withdrawal from racing of course…

Etcetera…

(M Hewitt)

Further research- not exactly the shot of the heads I was after but a great view of the four-valver’s camshafts, plugs and gear driven cams which were characteristic of this Mk6 engine used by Clark and the Mk7 allocated to the Brabham Racing Organisation- the two only 1.5 litre FWMV four valve engines.

The mechanic (who is it folks?) got the Lotus 33 back together in time for Jim to win the Dutch Grand Prix the following July 1965 day from Jackie Stewart’s BRM P261 and Dan Gurney’s Brabham BT11 Climax.

(MotorSport)

Denis Jenkinson eliciting information on the specification of the three Lotus 33’s at Spa in June 1965.

The #17 machine is Jim’s race car fitted with the four-valve engine- note the low level exhausts fitted to his two cars whereas the #18 Mike Spence 33 has a much earlier spec Climax fitted with two-plane crank and crossover exhaust.

Jim won come raceday from Stewart and McLaren’s Cooper T77 Climax with Mike seventh on a circuit where the extra 10bhp or so would have made a hellluva difference.

(unattributed)

Still in the Spa paddock, note the distinctive ribbing on the cam covers of the four valve engine compared with the two valve motor shown in the drawing below. Low level exhausts, Lucas fuel injection- output of this FWMV Mk6 was quoted as 212bhp @ 10,300rpm and 119 lb/ft of torque at 8,900rpm.

ZF five speed transaxle, rubber donuts at the driveshaft inner ends, outboard non-ventilated disc brakes and rear suspension comprising single top link, inverted lower wishbone, two radius rods, coil spring/damper unit and magnesium upright- period typical and oh-so-effective, the rear end bite, traction of the 25/33’s was said to be one of the performance differentiators compared with the BRM P261.

Lotus 25 and early FWMV Weber carbed Mk1 or 2 V8 drawn (unattributed)

Credits…

Getty Images, Doug Nye, M Hewitt, MotorSport, Vic Berris, Coventry Climax, ‘1 1/2 Litre Grand Prix Racing: Low Power, High Tech’ Mark Whitelock

Tailpiece…

(Getty)

A capable pilot, Prince Phillip about to leave Coventry, no doubt he had promised the Queen he would be back in London before afternoon tea- Westland Wessex ‘chopper?

Finito…

pete

(The Cahier Archive)

Well, Mike Spence in any event. His ‘Parnell Racing’ Lotus 25 BRM is ‘in drag’ for filming of John Frankenheimer’s iconic racing film ‘Grand Prix’…

James Garner played Aron, the helmet design that of Chris Amon, Aron drove for the fictional, nascent Japanese ‘Yamura’ team after being booted out of the Jordan BRM team in a crash which took out his teammate ‘Scott Stoddard’.

In the race itself the great British ‘all-rounder’ Spence finished an excellent 5th behind Brabham, Hill, Clark and Stewart…

spence solvers

Mike Spence in his factory BRM P261 on the ‘BRDC Intl Trophy’ grid, Silverstone 29 April 1967. He was 6th in the race won by Mike Parkes’ Ferrari 312. ‘Gedda move on with the start’ seems to be the pose? (unattributed)

Photo Credit: The Cahier Archive

Chapp

Fabulous shot of the Mike Spence/Phil Hill Chaparral 2F Chev at La Source hairpin, Spa-Francorchamps, May 1967. 

The cars automatic gearbox failed in a race won by the Ickx/Thompson/Rees Mirage M1 Ford. 1967 was the last year of the 7-litre ‘monsters’, the CSI mandated a 5-litre limit from ’68.

Ford started the ’67 season with their new Ford GT MkIV and then left the scene having won Le Mans twice on the trot. ‘Mission accomplished’ in a sense. Ferrari won the championship from Porsche by two points in a season of grids comprising Ferrari P3/4, Porsche 910, Lola T70 , Ford GT40’s , Alfa Romeo T33 , Mirage M1 and Matra M630- truly a sportscar season to savour.

le mans 67 start

As Mike Spence buckles up his seatbelt in the Chaparral 2F Chev, second on the grid, he is surrounded by FoMoCo vehicles; #1 the victorious Gurney/Foyt, #3 Bianchi/Andretti and Hulme/Ruby Mk4’s, and the #5 Gardner/McCluskey and Schlesser/Ligier Mk2’s…not a Ferrari close by! (Unattributed)

The 2F was consistently quick throughout the season but often the transmission main drive-bearing failed. Both Hill and Spence were popular Chaparral team members. Of Hill, Jim Hall said ‘Phil was a great guy with a lot of talent and really fun to work with because he understood a lot of what was going on.’

“I think he was probably as good as anybody at making the car finish. He’d put many cars together himself and knew how everything was made and how to take care of it. He was a great endurance driver for other reasons, but for that reason too. When we got near the Can-Am season in 1966 we decided we’d offer Phil a drive. He was a great guy to have on your team – he pulled for you and worked for you. And in the endurance races he was our man. I think Phil enjoyed driving for us, we just had a good relationship.”

Phil Hill never raced again after his ’67 Brands 6 Hour victory, a great way to bow out after such a career of achievement. ‘It was absolutely satisfying to win that race at Brands Hatch…in retrospect there couldn’t be a better way to finish a career could there?’ he said.

The 1967 Endurance Season is covered in full in this article on the Ferrari P4…https://primotipo.com/2015/04/02/ferrari-p4canam-350-0858/

phil hill

Phil Hill pondering 2F transmission dramas at Le Mans 1967. Mike Spence sans helmet behind him. (Dave Friedman)

Hall also had great respect for Spence, who was killed at Indianapolis in May 1968 in a Lotus 56. “I really thought a lot of Mike. He was an awfully talented driver, very quick and a smart guy who worked hard. He was a good fit for Chaparral too. It takes the right kind of person to be on your team who fits in with your people and how they work and Mike fitted us well and was a joy to work with.”

Designer/Driver/Engineer Jim Hall’s cars bristled with innovation. The winged, 7-litre Chevrolet engined, fibreglass monocoque, auto ‘tranny Chaparrals thrilled European spectators and finally won a ’67 race, the Brands Hatch 6 Hour event in July before returning to their Midland, Texas base and the US Can-Am Championship from whence they came.

chapp spa

2F at rest, Spa pits 1967. Hill talks about set-up with Jim Hall. Note the front lip or splitter. Spence put the car on pole at 3:31:5, quick enough for sixth on the GP grid that June…in a car designed for 24 hour events. OK its 7-litres, but remarkable all the same. (Unattributed)

Innovative Chaparral 2F Chev…

The 2F was a massive departure from previous Chaparrals’ even by their standards.

chap 2f aero

This drawing neatly shows the Chap 2F key aero elements; cars shape, front spring loaded flap, you can just see the chin lip spoiler used on some tracks at the front. Rear mounted rads and beautiful ducting in and out and the movable high rear wing, to alter between download and neutral positions. (Brian Hatton)

The car featured hip mounted radiators to better position weight, this had the bi-product of keeping the cockpit cooler. The 5-year old 2A chassis had special mouldings bonded to it to create the square sided shape, the transformations were such that they were effectively new. To provide bodywork strength, sections were laid up in female moulds with 4-oz cloth and epoxy resin and ¼ in PVC foam. In areas where strength wasn’t required the fibreglass was very thin. Firestone developed wider tyres for ’67 which required wider bodywork. The actual chassis was covered by flat panels on either side, these were ‘skins’ with empty space between them and the old chassis.

Externally, only the central cab section looked the same. A new body profile was evolved in the form of a wedge to generate downforce. At the rear the body tapered away to a ‘spindle shape’ with a ‘chopped off tail’.

To balance downforce at the front a similar type of high mounted wing as was used on the ’66 2E Can-Am car was used, mounted directly to the rear uprights. The wing was connected to a foot pedal, and via hydraulics allowed the driver to have feathered ‘lo-drag’ or maximum downforce modes. Should anything go wrong with the feathering mechanism, or the driver needed his left foot for the brakes, the car went to fail safe maximum downforce, understeer mode.

The front opening contained a spring-loaded flap or duct that opened against air pressure when speeds exceeded 120mph, this helped balance aerodynamic loads front to rear.

The body floated free on its springs devoid of practically any downforce which was applied directly to the uprights by the monster rear wing. As the nose of the car pitched forward more front downforce was generated, at 150mph the nose compressed the front suspension, the trapdoor or flap opened progressively at 120-140mph at which point the car would then settle to its appropriate ride height front/rear.

2f naked at le mans

2F naked at Le Mans for its transmission repair. Big wing and its mount direct to rear suspension uprights, note forward facing support strut. Mid mounted radiators, seat belt in the cockpit, radiator header tank, bell mouths of Chev/Weber carbs, spare wheel housing, exhaust ducting. ‘Le Mans’ number lights, 12X16 inch Chap alloys and big, wide Firestones. (Albert Bochroch)

Chaparral modelled both aluminium Chev 327CID  and 427CID engines- different car weight limits were applicable under the regulations. They considered the existing Can-Am aluminium chassis with 5-litre engine, and a fibreglass chassis car with the bigger 7-litre ‘lump’. The 5.4-litre engine could have been ‘de-stroked’. Simulations showed the latest staggered valve ‘porcupine’ 7-litre Chev, cast in aluminium was the faster option. It weighed 85lbs more then the ‘smallblock’ but gave around 100bhp more. The engine used Weber style 58 IDM carburetors built by Chev and gave circa 575bhp @ 7500 rpm.

The Chaparral’s GM automatic transaxle was upgraded to three speeds but the ‘box was at its limits. The increased power and torque proved the gearbox was the packages weak link- this was feared by Chaparral from the start of the 2F program. GM simply did not want to build a new transmission and hoped internal changes could cope with the 7- litres greater torque, but this was not the case.

There is a lot of mystique about the transmission. Pete Lyons, in his ‘Profile Publications’ article on the Chaparral ‘Glassfibre Cars’ described it as follows, “It was laid out much like a Hewland with 2 speeds and later 3 and an hydraulic coupling, a torque convertor instead of a clutch.”

“The gears were simple straight-cut spurs engaged by sliding dog clutches; every second dog was cut back a little to assist the clutchless changes. The changes were all done manually, the driver easing his throttle foot to unload the dogs and snatching the gear as quickly as he could. It therefore wasn’t really an automatic transmission, it was a fluid clutch transmission. The engine was always started with a gear engaged, the driver preventing a lunge forward by firm pressure with his left foot. At…5000rpm the coupling was designed to lock up rigidly to prevent further slip and power loss. Sensitive drivers could feel this happening.”

The advantages of the ‘box were better modulation of braking, on down changes the fluid coupling lessened any tendency of the rear wheels to lock, finally the fluid coupling absorbed many shock loads such as a ‘yump’ landing, common at the time.

2f

Superb James Allington cutaway of the 2F showing all of its innovations : fibreglass monocoque, wing, automatic transmission, 7-litre aluminium block Chev…1967 remember. Simply superb innovative design and execution by Jim Hall and his Texas Team (James Allington)

Jim Hall’s attention to weight saving was fanatical, the car weighed 1750lbs wet, 600lbs less! than the Ford MkIV. This was due to the fibreglass chassis, aluminium rather than (Ford) iron block engine. The batteries were of very expensive cadmium from the aerospace industry.

The body was made of a sandwich of 1/4 inch thick PVC foam between thin skins of ‘4oz cloth’ impregnated with Shell epoxy resin which was formed to shape in a vacuum bag apparatus and then cured at room temperature. Sylvania made new quartz iodide lights using hand made bulbs in Marchal reflectors.

The whole car was built to exceptionally high aerospace standards of quality and finish.

hall chap 2g

Jim Hall in his 1967 Can-Am challenger, the Chaparral 2G Chev at Bridgehampton. DNF chassis failure. The McLaren M6 Chevs were dominant that year, Robin Herd, the M6 designer freely acknowledged the effect Halls’ designs, especially the 2E, the first car with the high wing had on him. Hulme won the race in his M6A. (Pete Lyons)

Jim Hall and Aerodynamics…

Gordon Kirby interviewed Jim Hall in 2008, he published these comments by Hall about his seminal aerodynamic work in the mid-sixties.

“We calibrated the suspension by just rolling the car out and putting weights on it so we knew what load it took to move the car up and down. We had a cable drive that drove a pencil and a roll of paper that was run by a little motor so you could set your zero point. You would go out and make a run and push a button and make a mark across the paper so we knew what the front and rear downforce was. You could run a couple of different speeds and then you could put it on a graph. You knew that it was increasing as the square of the speed so you knew what the curve looked like and you pretty much had the downforce over a speed range. That was pretty simple to do.”

Hall’s method of measuring the air pressure or downforce on the surface of his car’s wings or bodywork was equally simple in concept. “The other thing we did was when we needed to change the surface we had a manometer that was just a bunch of u-tubes made out of tigon tubing and full of coloured water,” Hall related. “If you were in a sportscar you put it in the seat beside you and then went out and tapped a bunch of holes in the paper. You ran these to one side of the tubes and ran the other one to a pitot tube so you could get the dynamic air pressure on the surface.”

“I originally did it with a Polaroid camera. I had a Polaroid camera mounted on the dash and the manometer mounted on the seat back beside me. I didn’t even have a pitot tube for a static pressure source. I read in a book somewhere that a guy in WWI thought about doing this. The way he thought about doing it was you took a thermos bottle and put a piece of tubing in it and right before you made the test you opened it up then closed it so you had static air pressure in it. Then you went out to make your run and compared it to the pressures you got, then opened it and made sure it didn’t change. In a matter of about twenty minutes that thermos bottle would maintain an even enough temperature that the pressure wouldn’t change much. So you had some static pressure while you were sitting in the pit and you also had static pressure when you were going down the straightaway. It’s simple-minded, but pretty tricky! And that’s the way we started.”

“Then we bought a light airplane pitot tube and mounted it out front of the car. We found a static pressure place where we could run that pitot tube that matched the thermos. Then we had a static pressure source all the time.’

Thus began the serious science of racing car aerodynamics. Of course, Hall had no idea about the depth of the pandora’s box he was opening but he is without doubt the father of the modern aerodynamically-driven racing car.

targa overhead

This overhead shot is of the 2F at Targa 1967, drivers Hill and Hap Sharp. The angle is interesting; you can see the contours of the car, radical for the time. Front flap exit above the number, mid-ships mounted rads and exit venting, the row of 3 circular vents in the rear panel to relieve air pressure and the ever present driver adjustable rear wing, max downforce for 90% of the time in Sicily I imagine. (Unattributed)

 

cahp le mans

Chaparral 2F Chev ‘butt shot’ in the Le Mans parc ferme. The radically different aerodynamic treatment in terms of both the cars shape and rear wing apparent. Road registered to boot…The car qualfied 2nd in the hands of Mike Spence and Phil Hill, they retired on lap 225 with transmission oil seal failure. The sister Jennings/Johnson 2F failed after 91 laps with starter and battery dramas. The race was won by the Gurney/Foyt Ford MkIV. (Unattributed)

 

bonnier chap 2 d

The 1967 Chaparral 2F’s predecessor in endurance racing was the 1966 2D, here in Jo Bonnier’s hands in the Karussel at the Nurburgring where he and Phil Hill won on the cars European debut. The 2D also used a fibreglass monocoque chassis, had a 2 rather than 3 speed box of the 2F and was powered by a Chev 327cid/5360cc ‘small block’ Chev giving circa 475 bhp @ 7000 rpm. Like the 2F, its race record was littered with DNF’s, 6 from 7 starts. (Unattributed)

Chaparral 2F: Eight race history…

One of the things which strikes you about this big car when you look at its speed during 1967 is its pace on all types of circuits. It was on pole at Monza, Spa, and the Nurburgring, started from grid position two at Sebring and Le Mans, and grid three at Brands.

The challenges of the Daytona bowl are vastly different to the swoops and curves of Targa or the ‘Ring let alone the high speed challenge of Le Mans. It was clearly a complete-car, an excellent all around package- the best car, Phil Hill was quoted as saying, that he ever drove.

At Daytona 2F ran with its wing fixed in position, but still only just missed pole. Hill lead, took the fastest race lap and was pulling away from the Ferrari P4s until the fourth hour, falling off on marbles after a pitstop and hitting a wall. Hill was a little miffed that teammate Mike Spence, with whom he had a great working relationship, had not warned him about the hazard, their race ended on lap 93, Bandini and Amon took a Ferrari P4 win.

2 f sebring

Mike Spence here, and Jim Hall raced the 2F at Sebring. Fastest race lap but again DNF with ‘box troubles. (Nigel Smuckatelli)

At Sebring Hill was forced to retire from the meeting having acute appendicitis, so Jim Hall stepped into the car with Spence, he was second on the grid but had trouble starting. The car retired on lap 145 with differential failure, the car car trailed smoke for several laps in advance of retirement, victory went to the McLaren/Andretti Ford MkIV.

In Europe the cars were based in Frankfurt, the Monza event was the first on the continent. Spence put the car on pole, using the second 2D chassis converted to 2F spec, and from the flag diced with the P4s but a universal joint failure eliminated the car before the end of the first hour. Bandini/Amon won in a P4.

At Spa a week later, the car had a small trim tab added at the wings trailing edge, the tab made it easier to adjust the wings settings at high speed. Hill put the car on pole by 3.5 seconds but rain fell on Sunday. ‘Rainmaster’ and local boy Jacky Ickx “ate us alive” Hill said. Spence ran in fifth until a fuel stop after which the car refused to start. At half distance it was eighth but another blown transmission seal caused its retirement. Ickx and Thomson won in a Mirage M1.

2 f targa

Phil Hill in his ‘outta this world’ futuristic Chaparral juxtaposed with the ancient Sicilian landscape…and the oh-so-conventional, if gorgeous Ferrari P4s for that matter. But Porsche prevailed, as they so often did at Targa. (Yves Debraine)

Mike Spence had other commitments so Hap Sharp stepped in with Phil Hill at the Little Madonie. The 575 bhp ‘roller skate’ was a challenge around the mountainside of the famous Targa course.

Local boy, Nino Vaccarella was faster in practice than the 2F by 1.5 minutes, the car not entirely happy over the bumps but was still up to fourth, 9.5 minutes behind the leading Porsche when a tyre went flat at Collesano. Paul Hawkins and Rolf Stommelen took the win in a factory Porsche 910.

targa 2f

Lookout! Phlegmatic Siciliani…Targa 1967. Ride height up for this event, front splitter replete with an empty pasta packet clear. Phil Hill/ Hap Sharp Chap 2F. (Unattributed)

At the ‘Ring Spence took five seconds from the old sportscar lap record and set the first over 100mph lap by a sporty. John Surtees was seven seconds adrift in his Lola T70. Hill put on his harness after the Le Mans start so came around in sixth, by lap eight he moved into the lead, but at about the 1.5 hour mark, on lap 10, the cars transmission again failed. Schutz/Buzzeta won in a Porsche 910.

chap 2f nurburgring

Phil Hill is back in the pack on lap 1 of the Nurburgring 1000Km, having carefully put on his ‘belt. Amongst the class cars are a Ford GT40 in front of him, you can also see the nose of the Surtees/David Hobbs Lola T70Mk3 Aston Martin behind and to the side, DNF with rear suspension failure. That wing will have given cars being pursued no doubt as to the car behind! (Automobile Year)

Le Mans was and still is all important, two Chaparrals ran. Hill/Spence missed pole by only 0.3 of a second from a Ford MkIV. Johnson/Jennings in the other 2F were 24th. Both 2F’s got away well, by the end of the first hour Spence was fourth and by the second he was 2nd, then the wing actuation mechanism broke, the car went into high downforce, safe mode, knocking around 40 mph off the top speed.

Inevitably the transmsision gave trouble but the car was still in third when an heroic three hour rebuild of the transmission was commenced by the crew, all to no avail as the car was withdrawn. The other 2F retired earlier with electrical failure. The race was famously won by the All American Boys, AJ Foyt and Dan Gurney in a Ford MkIV.

le mans rebuild

The long three hour, crowd pleasing, crowd appreciating transmission rebuild is underway. Le-Mans 1967. Franz Weis and Karl Schmid start the process by stripping the rear of the car to gain ‘box access, no mean feat in itself given the careful integration of the overall package. (Karl Ludvigsen)

The inaugural Brands Hatch 500 Miles was the last championship race of the season. The Brabham/Hulme LolaT70 was on pole, Spence/Hill were 0.8 second adrift in third. Hulme took the lead but retired with rocker failure, letting the 2F into the lead. A long mid-race pitstop dropped them back to third but consistent laps taking two seconds per lap from the Ferrari in front saw the wonderful car displace the Stewart/Amon Ferrari P4. A winner, finally!

Motor racing is full of ‘ifs, buts and maybes’.

As the great, late and laconic Frank Gardner said ‘If Yer Aunty had Balls She’d be Yer Uncle’.

One wonders what this seminal, defining, brilliant car would have achieved had the ‘oh-so-clever’ ‘automatic gearbox’ which was such a big part of most of the Chaparral 2 program, had the re-engineered gearbox it so badly needed and deserved.

In a sad sequel, Jim Hall was preparing for another season with a 7-litre car for 1968 when the FIA announced a 3- litre limit for prototypes from 1968 and limited sportscars to 5-litres in capacity- 25 examples of which had to be built for homologation. The big Fords and Chaparrals were out, racing was the poorer for it.

It was not over for Chaparral of course, but after 1967 they focused on their domestic Can-Am Championship with equally radical cars, and many years later a victorious assault on the Indy 500, both stories for another time.

chap 2 hill brands

Mike Spence in the 2F at Brands Hatch headingfor victory and running ahead of the factory Ferrari P4 of Ludovico Scarfiotti and Peter Sutcliffe, 5th. (Louis Klemantaski)

Tailpiece…

chap 2 j riverside

Its hard to know which of Jim Hall’s cars was the wildest, perhaps the ’69 Can-Am 2H, a very unsuccessful one i will write about soon. He doubled his bets with the 1970 2J, the famous ‘ground effect sucker’ car being so quick officialdom banned it and with it the whole ethos that made the Can-Am the great ‘Formula Libre’ Series that it was. Here at Riverside, sportscar ace Vic Elford in the 2J Chev leads Peter Gethin in the championship winning McLaren M8D Chev. Hulme won the race in the other M8D, Gethin DNF engine on lap 21 and Elford DNF engine on lap2. (Unattributed)

Etcetera…

jim and phil

Jim Hall, left and Phil Hill CanAm 1966. (Unattributed)

 

chap drawings

Chaparral 2F drawing, car depicted as it raced at Targa 1967. (Unattributed)

 

sebring engine change

Sebring engine change showing the girth of the aluminium 7-litre ‘big block’ Chev and the housing of the famous GM ‘automatic’ transaxle. I wonder how long the change it took from start to finish? (Unattributed)

 

targa butt shot

Targa 2F butt shot, aero treatment of the car nicely contrasts with the Sicilian ‘roadies’. Wing in maximum downforce mode. Note the rear devoid of tail panel, compared with the earlier Le-Mans rear shot. (Bernard Cahier)

 

hill aviating

Phil Hill aviating the 2F at the Nurburgring despite the Chaparral wing in full downforce mode! Lightening fast, the 1000Km  another race the car should have won on a circuit one would not necessarily have thought it were suited. A versatile car the 2F, quick pretty much everywhere. (Unattributed)

 

cahap family tree

The ‘Chaparral Family Tree’…(Unattributed)

Credits… 

Pete Lyons ‘The Chaparral 2,2D,2F The Glassfibre Series’ Profile Publications, Cutaway drawing- James Allington, Jim Hall quotes from a Gordon Kirby ‘MotorSport’ articles in November 2008 and January 2011, Dave Friedman, Bill Wagenblatt ‘Track Thoughts’, Albert Bochroch, Nigel Smuckatelli, Karl Ludvigsen, Bernard Cahier, Louis Klemantaski, Brian Hatton

See this link for some great information on Jim Halls fabulous cars…

http://www.thechaparralfiles.com/

Finito…